The «sovereignty of the imamate» (Siyādat Al-Imāma) of the Jazūliyya-Ghazwāniyya: a sufi alternative to sharifism?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.1996.v17.i2.556Abstract
This article details the doctrine of the aṭ-Ṭā’ifa al-Jazūliyya, a populist and politically active Sufi order that dominated Moroccan mysticism throughout the sixteenth century. This doctrine focused on the concept of paradigmatic sainthood (quṭbiyya) and was influenced by two different models of religious authority. The first model saw authority as an acquired property, which was vested in the Sufi shaykh who best mirrored the qualities of the Prophet Muḥammad. The second model conceived of authority as an ascribed property, and saw it as an inborn grace (baraka) that was transmitted via descent through the Prophetic bloodline. In the writings of the Jazūliyya shaykh ‛Abdallah al-Ghazwānī (d. 935/1528-9), both models of authority were seen as part of the «prophetic inheritance» (al-wirātha an-abawiyyd), and were reconciled through the doctrine of the «sovereignty of the imamate» (siyādat al-imāma). In this doctrine, the axial saint of Moroccan Sufism, whom al-Ghazwānī called the jaras or «Bell-saint», stood as the successor (khalīfa) to the Prophet Muhammad and prime interpreter of Islam. He thus took on many of the qualities of the Shi‛ite Imam, an posed a serious challenge to the political leaders of the time.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.