Las diferencias entre la jurisprudencia andalusí y el resto de la escuela de Mālik: el texto atribuido a Abū Isḥāq al-Garnāṭī

Abstract

In the Arabic manuscript n.° 1077 from El Escorial we find an Abū Isḥāq al-Garnāṭī's (ob. 1183) work whose last chapter consists of the enumeration of twenty-two juridical rules: in four of them the andalusiyyūn did not follow Mālik's doctrine, and in the other eighteen they disagreed with Ibn al-Qāsim. The same text appears also at the end of Ibn Hishām al-Qurṭubī's {oh. 1209) K. al-Mufid, In the present article, its author, after explaining the notion of local 'amal (usus fori), raises the problem of this text's authorship, presents a critical edition and translation of it from the two aforementioned sources and makes a diacronic research into the application in al-Andalus of those controversial norms. The research shows that those divergences with regard to Mālik's or Ibn al-Qāsim's opinions not always remained in force but rather characterized the «early» Andalusian jurisprudence.